🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy worked, and disclosed new appeals had come from go-betweens to restart talks with the US government. He said Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Path

Araghchi is treading a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a situation of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president declaring the sites had been obliterated. Subsequently, Western states employed their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations resume.

Trump last week said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his address to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by armed force. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and stays the final resolution to resolve disputes, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the state in the wake of this invasion."