🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.